Short Stories, Film Reviews, and Recipes

Tag: Horror Movies

Choosing Between Art House and Horror

I know several people who refuse to watch horror films. Some say the movies are too violent, moronic, or poorly made. There’s a great deal of truth to that criticism since many horror movies are incredibly dumb and difficult to watch unless you’re comatose.

However, the lines between horror, art-house, and thriller genres have been blurred since the late 20th century. Even the staunchest opponents of scary movies have probably viewed an award-winning film like The Silence of the Lambs.

How did Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins persuade people to watch a story about a serial killer who appreciates rare moths, tucks his manhood between his legs, and rips the skin off his victims so he can sew together a nifty skin suit to show off to other degenerates?

How does a mainstream movie get away with including a scene where a prisoner throws his semen in the face of an FBI agent in training?

The answer to both questions is talent. The Silence of the Lambs is a sick, disturbing movie, but it’s well done. No, Meggs’ DNA slinging sequence could not have been accepted by the MPAA unless it was produced with the utmost precision.

The actors rehearsed the scene for several weeks before the eighteen-hour shooting began. They worked with a biology professor, dermatologist, and adult film star to get a feel for the scene.

Method acting took on a disturbing new meaning to the troubled cast, and Jodie Foster spent a fortune on therapy after the shooting wrapped.

Wow, His eyes are pretty like mine. They sure keep this prison glass clean. Do they just use Windex–It’s got to be something stronger.

The nonsense I just wrote was only to prove a point that many scenes require days of preparation and hard work to accomplish for a few minutes or seconds of edited footage. Many horror movies (and movies in general) skip the preparation, and it’s often evident in the results.

Slasher films or monster movies are what most non-horror lovers associate with horror. They seem linear and uncreative on the surface.

Drunken teenagers who repeatedly ignore common sense and allow themselves to be massacred in inventive ways is a stereotypical plot that reached its peak in the 1980s.

Unlike many critics, I like slasher movies like Friday the 13th and A Nightmare on Elm Street. They may not be considered cinematic masterpieces, but they sometimes scared and entertained me as a kid. Now, those films make me laugh, but they’re still entertaining.

Slasher films made a killing at the box office in the 80s, but most critics hated them and believed they were exploitative garbage. The late film critic, Gene Siskel, despised Friday the 13th (1980) and went to great lengths to show his displeasure.

He contacted Paramount and lectured them about their immoral filmmaking, and he wrote a letter to Betsy Palmer, the actress who played Jason’s mother (the real killer), to express his disappointment that she lowered herself to accept a role in such a horrible movie.

His efforts were in vain, and the fans won out. Until 2018, the Friday the 13t h series was the most successful horror franchise in history. The first film made over 59 million dollars in 1980, and it spawned sequels, a remake, tv-series and video games.

It launched the career of the untalented goofball Kevin Bacon and solidified Sean Cunningham as a horror director. I think it’s exploitative (which I didn’t mind too much when I was ten years old) and not as well acted or produced as Silence of the Lambs.

However, if you compare the plots of the two films, Friday seems tamer and less demented. If you take away the graphic violence, nudity, and bad acting (what the critics complained about), the movie has a lot of charm and a great soundtrack.

It makes you want to go to a summer camp, armed with a flame thrower and wood chipper, to relax by the lake. Why didn’t they ever try killing Jason (in the sequels) with a wood chipper? That should have worked.

I like some of the lousy slasher films, and I enjoy a few of the Oscar-winning thrillers, but trying to categorize horror films into several different groups seems pointless.

It’s more marketable to call a prestige film a thriller than a horror movie, and I understand why, but it still bothers me.

Is Blue Velvet Art House Horror?

In 1986, my parents went to see Blue Velvet.

Since they didn’t want me to be alone in the house unsupervised (I enjoyed pyrotechnics and fire in general as a child—no one was ever hurt or burned. I swear.), they took me along but wisely prohibited me from seeing the movie.

They bought me a ticket for The Golden Child and told me to have fun. As an eleven-year-old who had never viewed a movie without my friends or family sitting next to me, I wasn’t thrilled to sit next to odd-smelling strangers.

The theater filled up fast, and I wound up enjoying the movie with an exceptionally rowdy biker gang. They had matching leather jackets and mullets. Yes, the women’s mullets resembled the men’s.

They were joking around and making a lot of noise during the previews, but when Eddie Murphy’s comic masterwork came on the screen, they were silent—until the first joke cracked them up.

I respected that, and soon I wasn’t scared that they would torment me for not wearing a leather jacket.

At that point in my life, I was probably wearing a Member’s Only jacket. The bikers looked tough, but deep down in their souls, they were more like the Grease bikers than the Hells Angels-type bikers.

I had a good time, but I wondered what kind of depravity I was missing in Blue Velvet. As it turns out, I was missing a goldmine of depravity.

Even though his films have humorous moments and inventive cinematography, David Lynch is not for most tastes.

Compared to mainstream horror films, Blue Velvet is scarier, bloodier, and more demented. It was marketed as a shocking thriller, but you never hear the term “horror film” associated with the movie.

For a high-brow audience, I guess you can’t associate it with Freddy Krueger, Jason Vorhees, Michael Myers, or Mia Farrow.

It’s a strange film that’s difficult to handle in some scenes. I liked it, but I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone with anxiety problems.

It’s entertainment that induces anxiety rather than curbs it, and while that isn’t good for all people (or most people), it’s interesting that some movies can alter your breathing, heart rate, and comfort level.

I don’t think Blue Velvet would’ve turned me into a raving lunatic as a child, but I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t have slept for a month or listened to Roy Orbison for the rest of my life.

Watching a lip-sticked Dennis Hopper terrorize poor Kyle Maclachlan while he quotes In Dreams is not good publicity for Roy Orbison, but strangely enough, it did revive sales of the song and his greatest hits.

The opening lines are pretty creepy for a hit song.

In Dreams

By Roy (weirdo) Orbison

A candy-colored clown they call the Sandman

Tiptoes to my room every night

Just to sprinkle stardust and to whisper

Go to sleep; everything is alright

Everything is going to be alright

Besides the horror of seeing Dennis Hopper huffing gas and speaking like a baby while he sodomizes Isabella Rossellini, you have Kyle MacLachlan doing the chicken dance, a severed ear, a love of Heineken beer in 1986, a graphic close-up headshot in slow-motion, a corpse with his brain hanging out that remains standing, and a horse-faced prostitute dancing in a pink mini skirt.

Now, that’s horror. So, if you hate horror movies, you can avoid the ones that aren’t marketed as something else, but you might accidentally stumble into one. Have you ever seen Howard the Duck?

Short, Film Reviews Part 2

Groovy Van. The bloodstains are a nice touch.

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974)

Franklin: If I have any more fun today, I don’t think I’m gonna be able to take it!

Tobe Hooper’s second feature-length film is full of bad decisions, and for a movie named The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, it’s odd that the lovable Leatherface kills only one person with a chain saw.

The film’s story involves a young woman and her brother who travel with their three friends to a cemetery in Texas to identify the vandalized remains of a family member.

They decide to search for their relative’s family estate in the country but eventually run into Leatherface and his family of killer rednecks.

When I was a kid, I heard rumors about a scary, bloody movie in which tons of people were murdered with a chain saw.

Years later, I realized the rumors were untrue, and most of the meatheads spreading the lies were children who had not watched the movie.

Compared to most horror films, Chain Saw is not a bloody movie. It may be more terrifying than any film in history, but its horror doesn’t rely on cheap thrills or gory carnage.

It had a tiny budget, around $140,000, but it’s hard to tell if you watch it in HD. When I was in high school, I watched it on VHS, and it was bleak and grainy.

I thought the faded colors were merely the marks of a low-budget film made in the early ’70s. I loved the movie when I watched it on videotape, but I was shocked by the remastered version on DVD.

In the remastered cut of the film, the sprawling countryside of Central Texas is bright and beautiful. The colors are crisp, the sun is intense and impressive, and the imagery draws you in. The camerawork and editing are not low budget at all. They’re brilliant.

Although the actors weren’t well known at the time of the film’s release, they aren’t too bad. They’re talented and believable performers, but their characters make incredibly stupid decisions throughout the film.

This includes picking up a disgusting hitchhiker, letting the hitchhiker borrow a pocketknife, reading horoscopes from American Astrology, and wondering into an isolated home that Ed Gein would be proud of.

I don’t think it’s a slasher film, but it popularized the notion that young adults enjoy walking into dark places and dilapidated homes. It certainly influenced the dumb teenager craze of the ’80s and ’90s.

The jarring sound effects and grisly images propel you into a twisted world that makes you cringe. It’s horror at its finest, and I don’t recommend viewing it with young children or the grandparents.

Unless, of course, your family consists of cannibalistic bumkins who sell human barbecue. If that’s the case, they’ll really dig it.

Film Review: Doctor Sleep ⁕⁕⁕

Image result for doctor sleep images not copyright protected

Baseball Boy: Are you going to hurt me?

Rose the Hat: Yeah.

Since the 1976 film Carrie, Hollywood has turned several of Stephen King’s works into movies. King is a prolific writer whose vault of horror has enticed screenwriters, directors, and producers for the past four decades.

From 1976 to 1999, King’s works inspired twenty-seven films. Since 1999, countless television films, television series, and films followed, but the best ones, in my opinion, were made during the first twenty-three years. These include Carrie, The Shining, The Dead Zone, Cujo, Misery, Pet Sematary, Creepshow, The Running Man, Stand by Me, The Dark Half, and The Green Mile.

I’ve been a fan of Stephen King since I was nine years old (an appropriate age to start reading horror). One afternoon in Texas, I quietly pulled a copy of Cujo from my grandmother’s shelf and read for a few hours. I threw the book aside when my mother noticed I was reading a horror novel.

Although I was too young to understand why a character in Cujo was pleasuring himself over a bedspread, the terrifying and depressing story drew me in.  

I continue to enjoy King’s novels, and unlike some of his die-hard fans, I like many of the movies based on his work. Most of his work is challenging to translate into films.

King admits that he suffers from “diarrhea of the word processor”. He includes a vast amount of details and characters in his novels, and sometimes they’re too numerous to include in a screenplay.

Controversy often accompanies the opening of a Stephen King film, and Doctor Sleep is no different. Some critics complained that a scene involving the torture of a young boy was too brutal. It’s a harsh scene, but it’s based on a violent novel. Critics also slammed It for displaying acts of violence towards children.

Children always play a significant role in King’s novels. They are the heroes and often the victims. If you consider how dark and violent the stories It and Doctor Sleep are, you can’t complain about the brutality of the films.

It involves a demonic clown that terrorizes and kills the children of a small town every 27 years. Doctor Sleep centers on a traveling clan of magical killers. They roam around the country, torturing and killing children who possess the shining.

Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining did not please Stephen King. Kubrick’s version wasn’t faithful to the book, and to this day, the great Horror King of New England cannot understand why people consider The Shining as one of the greatest and scariest horror movies.

I understand why. Stanley Kubrick wasn’t concerned with making an utterly faithful adaption of King’s work; he wanted to make a horror film his way. The film’s rhythm is what makes The Shining so scary.

It’s not the type of horror film that makes you jump; it’s the type that causes the hairs on your arm to rise. I read The Shining and watched the movie, and I like both. King’s novel is scarier than Kubrick’s film, but I treat them as separate entities.

Reading horror gives me a different feeling than watching a horror film. I don’t get upset when everything I visualized from a novel isn’t displayed the same way in the movie.

I mention the Kubrick version of The Shining because Doctor Sleep desperately tries to replicate its mood, characters, and music. The opening notes of Doctor Sleep repeat the roaring Wendy Carlos soundtrack of The Shining. I like hearing Wendy Carlos again, and it’s one of the few “Kubrick tributes” that doesn’t irritate me.

Too Much Heartbeat

Mike Flanagan wrote and directed Doctor Sleep, and for the most part, he did a decent job. There’s solid acting, stylish visual effects, and plenty of frightening moments. However, Flanagan went overboard when his Kubrick man-crush affected his better judgment.

The slow, repetitive, heartbeat sound effect from The Shining established suspense in the first film, but Flannigan uses the beat so much that it becomes a common feature of the soundtrack. It doesn’t add to or increase the tension in the scenes but becomes a constant thump in the background.

Another aspect of the Kubrick love fest that doesn’t work is the use of different actors to portray Jack Nicholson, Scatman Crothers, and Shelley Duvall’s characters from The Shining. I understand that it’s practical to use new actors when you’re producing a sequel forty years after the original.

Scatman Crothers is no longer with us, and any digital representations of the original actors would’ve inflated the budget by several million. Henry Thomas (Elliot from E.T.) plays Lloyd the bartender/Jack Torrance, Carl Lumbly plays Dick Halloran, Roger Dale Floyd plays young Danny Torrance, and Alexandra Essoe plays Wendy Torrance.

The acting by this new group isn’t horrible, but as hard as they try to look and act like the originals, they can’t pull it off. It gives you a weird feeling when Danny Torrance doesn’t have the correct hairstyle in Doctor Sleep.

Danny Lloyd, the actor who played Danny Torrance in The Shining, had a hall of fame “bowl cut.” I’m an expert in the field of bowl cutting because I had the same haircut until 1983.

Roger Dale Floyd’s cut is puny and misshapen. It doesn’t hold a candle to Danny Lloyd’s massive bowl. The stylist from Doctor Sleep didn’t use the correct eight-quart mixing bowl to cut Floyd’s hair.

If you look fast, you’ll see Danny Lloyd, the true lord of follicles, in a cameo during the magic show.

Ewan McGregor plays a subdued Dan Torrance, and he’s right for the role. McGregor, like many talented actors from the UK, plays an American more convincingly than most American actors playing British roles.

Have you watched Keanu Reeves or Winona Ryder attempt a British accent in Bram Stoker’s Dracula? If you haven’t, it would be better if you only imagine it.

Dan Torrance is a recovering alcoholic, burdened with guilt, who can’t find his purpose in life. He moves to a small town in New Hampshire to live simply and forget the horrors of his past.

While working as a custodian in a hospice, he sees a cat scurry into a patient’s room. Azzie, the cat, knows when someone is close to death. When Azzie lays down on a patient’s bed, they pass away that night.

Dan uses the shining to speak to the dying men telepathically. He reassures them that there is life after death, and he describes death as a long sleep. One man nicknames him Doctor Sleep.

Dan finally finds a use for the shining that doesn’t involve the ghosts from his past. He’s content with the calm of his new life until Abra contacts him.

Kyliegh Curran & Rebecca Ferguson

Abra, played by newcomer Kyliegh Curran, is a teenager with powerful psychic abilities. She has the shining, like Dan, but her powers are more focused and refined.

She can locate people who are hundreds of miles away, with her mind. She reads people’s thoughts and tears into their brains to find hidden memories. Dan finds a message on a blackboard in his room sent telepathically by Abra, and he corresponds with her in the same way for eight years.

When Abra’s shine allows her to witness the killing of a young boy, she cries out in terror. The cry knocks Dan to the ground, and it forces Rose the Hat to pause her murderous act.

Rose the Hat, played by Rebecca Ferguson, is the wicked leader of the True Knot. Her clan travels in a caravan to find and feed on gifted children. The kids release “steam” when they’re tortured, and the group inhales it to extend their lifespan.

The clan’s eyes glow blue when they take steam. Their wounds heal, their grey hair turns brown, and their abilities increase in power. They cuddle each other after killing a young boy. The True Knot are sick puppies.

After Rose becomes aware of Abra and how powerful she is, she decides her group needs the girl. Slowly Killing Abra would give the group a jackpot of steam. Rose, using her mind powers, pursues Abra but realizes the little girl is stronger.

I like the interactions between Rose and Abra. The teenager, brimming with psychic energy, taunts the experienced killer and injures her. Most horror movies feature a villain who terrorizes his victims, but in Doctor Sleep, the victim torments the villain.

The mind battles between Abra and Rose are incredibly entertaining. Special effects play a significant role in the action, and the way they represent telepathic travel between the heroes and the killers is unique.

However, the attractive visuals would mean nothing if the acting reeked. Have you watched Kevin Bacon in Friday the 13th? He’s so bad, you’re relieved when he’s skewered.

Horror movies are notorious for bad acting, but Doctor Sleep is different. Ferguson’s performance is a standout. Her ghoulish killer is charming, cruel, and attractive. She’s evil but somehow likable.

Another high point of the film is Curran’s role. She’s new to the acting world, but she’s a talented performer. She brings humor and humility to her compelling character.

Doctor Sleep is a worthy sequel to The Shining and more enjoyable than most horror produced today.

Its excellent acting and nifty effects boost the morbid tale, but the numerous Kubrick love notes interfere with the storytelling. I ‘m sorry, Stephen King, but Stanley Kubrick (God rest his Soul) managed to infect your vision once again.

© 2024 Cooking and Cinema

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑